Entries Tagged as 'Madison Dialogue Manufacturing Group'

Interview with Steve D’Esposito On The Radical Center and The Move To Resolve

Introduction:

Recently, Steve left his position at Earthworks, which he founded, to become president of the nonprofit, Resolve. (See our recent post at: http://www.fairjewelry.org/archives/509)

Photobucket
(Steve D’Esposito, President of Resolve)

When I look at the last five years, I see that much of the momentum toward ethical sourcing in the jewelry sector can be traced back to Steve’s work and vision. He was instrumental designing the “No Dirty Gold” campaign, in creating the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance, in building relationships across sectors, and in creating the Madison Dialogue meeting which brought people from the sector together for the first time.

This is the second time that Steve has been interviewed on this blog. This time, I caught up with him before the official announcement and talked about the move.
~Marc Choyt, Publisher

Marc Choyt: What led you to leave Earthworks and join Resolve?

Steve D’Esposito: I have spent more and more of my time over the last few years, building bridges across the sectors and trying to identify leaders who want to actually develop and test solutions.

Resolve is perfectly suited to house this work. Resolve has intention, it has a result in mind—we refer to this as the “solve” part of the Resolve mission. But Resolve can also serve as a neutral ground, a place from which all who share that intention can work. That space is more difficult to create within an advocacy and campaigning organization.

I have been developing a concept which seeks to incubate, support, catalyze and credit some of the initial steps that companies and organizations are taking to put solutions in place. Where risk-taking and entrepreneurial activity is recognized, and those willing to take a step forward are recognized and rewarded. We will organize this work within a new initiative that we are calling the Earth Solutions Center at Resolve. It fits perfectly into the Resolve structure. We will also organize a Science Solutions capacity. This allows us to tap into both consensus building and facilitation expertise with science and technical expertise.

In fact, I first started talking to Resolve about potentially partnering with the Earth Solutions Center (which was going to be an independent organization). The conversation fairly quickly turned into a conversation about integration and an offer to run Resolve.

Marc Choyt: How does this tie into your work with the Madison Dialogues? Are you going to continue to support the efforts to create an “ethical platform?”

Steve D’Esposito: A lot of work is underway in the jewelry sector— I see a number of cutting edge projects from retailers, miners, and others.

The Madison Dialogue is a forum, a discussion group, and a very important one. It’s created an opportunity to foster relationships. It is a virtual entity. It’s great for information sharing and dialogue. It is, as you put it, an “ethical platform” and I will continue to support it—100%. Resolve will certainly support Madison Dialogue and similar efforts—whatever we can do, we will do.

The Earth Solutions Center can be a complement in that it creates a venue for testing, incubation and experimentation in an open-source, transparent format.

Marc Choyt: Have your efforts to work within the Radical Center space been hindered by your involvement in Earthworks, leading you to want to make this change?

Steve D’Esposito: It’s the result that matters. Earthworks has played and will continue to play a critical role as a catalyst. I look at the landscape and I see the need to be additive; to put some additional tools in the toolkit. I want to create space that works for Earthworks and Oxfam, Anglo Gold Ashanti and Rio Tinto, Leber Jewelers and Tiffany, and others. I am not looking to organize a love-fest here, but I do see places were opportunities are being missed and I want to capture those opportunities.

For me personally, what changes is that I have intention but I don’t have a specific dog in the fight.

Marc Choyt: Would you be interested in helping the Manufacturing Working group?

Steve D’Esposito: Yes, the Manufacturing dialogue is just the type of thing that I would be interested in supporting. Let’s explore what’s needed. Is it simply support, technical assistance, strategic guidance, someone to help the trains run on time? I would also like to look at current examples of emerging good practice.

Marc Choyt: Recently I was asked by another journalist, “What is responsible large scale mining?” I didn’t know quite how to answer that question, so I’m posing it to you.

Steve D’Esposito: Work is underway to develop a frame work for responsible mining through IRMA but that work is slow and plodding and is not fully resourced. CRJP is also doing work on gold and diamonds, but they face the challenge of how to more effectively engage stakeholders. ICMM has some excellent principles but verifying that you are credibly meeting your commitment to principles is a challenge without a set of standards or criteria.

At the same time if you survey the current landscape, you see companies innovating and getting results on the ground. I suspect that the best way to define responsible, large-scale mining is to survey best practice at current operations on an issue-by-issue basis. Where is good reclamation happening? Where has community sanction been achieved, etc.? That would be an interesting portrait to paint and one that may help the industry if it was actually painted.

Marc Choyt: Do you think that large scale mining can be called, “sustainable?”

Steve D’Esposito: Society needs and wants minerals and materials that are sourced from the Earth. The challenge that we have is to define responsibly sourced minerals and material and to create incentives for mining projects that can contribute to sustainable development. The fact is that with mining, you are depleting a resource. To the extent it stays in economy via recycling, that’s advantageous. So long as economy needs metals, then it is really a question of how society meets its mining and mineral needs more responsibly. The question that needs to be asked is, does that project contribute to responsible, ethical sourcing and sustainable development?

Marc Choyt: Are you going to continue working on mining issues with Resolve? How will it be different from what you did at Earthworks?

Steve D’Esposito: Yes. Mining issues and a broader set of natural resource and public health challenges.

I like your “radical center” reference. Within that, I would really like to focus on both theory and practice. The key is finding the right projects and organizations to test the theory in practice and then adapt the theory . The collaboration piece is key. So it involves finding the projects which people want to work with.

We need to show people that solutions exist, that they are practical, achievable and are good business. I take very seriously the business challenge—”let’s find a solution to this together.” That is a risk I am willing to take.

Share/Save/Bookmark

Fairjewelry.org: Who Are We?

Intro: Since the first post in Spring, 2007, this blog has evolved into a focused project demanding a great deal of voluntary time and resources. I publish here a revised ‘About Us’ section which accurately reflects our current direction. ~Marc Choyt, Publisher

Photobucket

Just a few years ago, before the Blood Diamond film and the No Dirty Gold campaign, very few people even considered the toxic supply chain behind an average piece of jewelry. Now, the movement to have an ethical mine-to-market supply chain has become mainstream news.

This gold rush for the next big growth market in the jewelry sector is taking place behind the scenes. Think Organic Food fifteen years ago, or Fair Trade Coffee in the Seventies. Jewelry is an emotional purchase. No one wants to support tons of toxic tailings with the purchase of their wedding ring.

Over the past year particularly, the largest players in the jewelry sector have been attempting to define the ‘ethical jewelry’ space to their best advantage with as little disruption to their complex supply chain as possible. Small scale manufacturers and miners, who are more agile, yet have a small media voice, are also hoping to get some part of this potentially strong new market.

Generally speaking, except for those truly committed to transparency, which are few and far between, the public will wind up seeing only the final branded package, designed to reveal the sunny side while hiding it’s toxicity.

For example… a few current trends in process that I pose as questions; Is it right to market a diamond as conflict free if it results in massive environmental damages or human rights abuses? Do you think it is fair to brand large scale pit mining, with massive pollution to aquifers, as ’sustainable’ and ‘loving’ toward the Earth? What if fair trade labeling organizations were to put a ‘fair trade tax’ on large scale diamond operations to make buckets of money—even if those diamond dealers were complicit in the death of 3.7 million people?

For a long time, I have attempted to hold the radical center, and to some degree, this site still has this as a major purpose. I want to focus on positive developments and not make the perfect enemy of the good. However, more and more, in order to maintain my own integrity, I find the need to expose lies and distortions.

I rely on my network of insiders, and the ability to connect apparently unrelated events that can sometimes seem like reading tea leaves. The sector is so secretive that you have to know both the right people and the right questions. I consider my viewpoint to be ‘pro-jewelry sector’, because the toxic elements of the sector can make any jeweler a ridiculously easy target; It’s just a matter of time. Denial, however, is solid. Exposing it with the hope that something might change is the equivalent of trying to carve granite with a plastic spoon.

Photobucket

I am President of Reflective Images Inc, a designer jewelry company located in Santa Fe, NM that was established in 1995. For my company, which I co-own with my wife, I am involved in strategic planning, marketing, website development and a myriad of other duties. My wife is the Creative Director, designing for our US and international production.

We are a small company of twelve people. In September, 2008, we were able to move our entire production, international and national, to recycled precious metals—a move we have been working on for years.

We are not perfect in our sourcing, because the supply chain is not mature enough yet and we have to survive somehow as we transition to who we want to be. But we are 100% transparent, and have developed an open source transparency system for others to use as well. We publish the Ethical Jewelry Handbook, a free e-book for the trade. This fall, I will be putting together a new free e-book for the public, and a new trade version as well. I am also spearheading an effort to create international fair trade manufacturing principals and standards.

The blog, writing handbooks, and my involvement in fair trade manufacturing issues, is a second full time job. Until fairjewelry.org, I knew of no central place where someone could go and find information. I am hoping within the next year to turn this project into a nonprofit company and gather still more resources.

I do not claim to be an expert. My views are continually evolving as I understand the myriad factors, including history, influencing events in this sector.

Yet, this blog is an extension of my ‘circle-based’ approach to business. A circle based understanding of life involves acknowledging how we are interconnected and working for economic systems that enhance community and support ecology.

My company’s activism and contribution to our local community was recently recognized by the Chamber of Commerce and City of Santa Fe, New Mexico. We were honored for Excellence in Business among all companies with five to twenty employees.

Understanding how the circle applies to business is one of the tasks that was set before me by the Indigenous wisdom keepers who have mentored me for the last twenty years. The abuse and destruction of indigenous culture is an outcome of many of the most distressing elements of the jewelry sector’s supply chain. This blog advocates for indigenous justice, which at its best means supporting the responsible efforts of artisan small scale miners.

The matrix of every business, its source of wealth, comes from communities. Communities that are strong are based on circles of fair exchange, not pyramids where all the benefit goes to a select few at the top. Our ‘resource-to-trash-to-cash’ economic model must be abandoned.

Finally, without the fine people who run the day-to-day operations of Reflective Images, I would not be able to focus so much time and energy to these issues. Of all those, I would especially like to acknowledge Marek Sutherland. Apart from being the front main customer service person for our company’s e-commerce platform, he does a fine job as webmaster, administrator and editor for this site.

Marc Choyt, Publisher and lead writer for fairjewelry.org

Share/Save/Bookmark